Oct. 30th, 2020 08:38 am
Progress on Jane Eyre, Part 2
So far, a major theme of Jane Eyre has been abuse and the reactions to and the processing of it.
It's interesting to see Jane go from just weathering it (her encounter with John Reed at the beginning), thinking of self-harm (starving herself after being shut up in the red room) to actively resisting her abusers (fighting and intimidating John Reed, rebuking Mrs. Reed before going to Lowood). She realizes that her "faults" are both exaggerated (or entirely imaginary) and not a valid justification for her abuse. She externalizes her abuse.
In contrast, Helen Burns is more passive and assumes that she deserves Miss Scatcherd's horrible treatment and the awful conditions of the Lowood Institution. She takes the excuses her abusers give her and internalizes them, believing them and even advocating for her own mistreatment.
It's pretty obvious (especially with that introduction - damn) which side Brontë takes, but it's also a reflection of society at the time that she felt like she had to make this point. From my own research, Helen's rationalization of abuse and acceptance of "character flaws" was very much expected and encouraged. It was seen as a sign of humility and moral character to accept poor treatment, especially if inflicted on your by your "betters". After all, bad things only happen to bad people, right? ("The poor deserve to be poor" was a common sentiment.)
It'll be interesting to see how these two characters' perspectives change (or if they do at all). So far, I've been really engaged with the character drama and Jane's personal development.
It's interesting to see Jane go from just weathering it (her encounter with John Reed at the beginning), thinking of self-harm (starving herself after being shut up in the red room) to actively resisting her abusers (fighting and intimidating John Reed, rebuking Mrs. Reed before going to Lowood). She realizes that her "faults" are both exaggerated (or entirely imaginary) and not a valid justification for her abuse. She externalizes her abuse.
In contrast, Helen Burns is more passive and assumes that she deserves Miss Scatcherd's horrible treatment and the awful conditions of the Lowood Institution. She takes the excuses her abusers give her and internalizes them, believing them and even advocating for her own mistreatment.
It's pretty obvious (especially with that introduction - damn) which side Brontë takes, but it's also a reflection of society at the time that she felt like she had to make this point. From my own research, Helen's rationalization of abuse and acceptance of "character flaws" was very much expected and encouraged. It was seen as a sign of humility and moral character to accept poor treatment, especially if inflicted on your by your "betters". After all, bad things only happen to bad people, right? ("The poor deserve to be poor" was a common sentiment.)
It'll be interesting to see how these two characters' perspectives change (or if they do at all). So far, I've been really engaged with the character drama and Jane's personal development.
Tags: